<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>KnowHR Blog - Latest Comments in When Pay-for-Performance Goes Bad</title><link>http://knowhr.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 09:24:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: When Pay-for-Performance Goes Bad</title><link>http://www.knowhr.com/blog/2008/09/09/when-pay-for-performance-goes-bad/#comment-2244657</link><description>I worked at a place like that too. We had bonuses for machine cycles. Guess what? Dry cycles were as good as product cycles...nutso. We got rid of that metric in a hurry.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">frankroche</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 09:24:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Pay-for-Performance Goes Bad</title><link>http://www.knowhr.com/blog/2008/09/09/when-pay-for-performance-goes-bad/#comment-2244354</link><description>Frank, I worked for a company that had quarterly bonuses with payouts measured on results against goals set.  In the last week of the quarter, production almost came to a halt because everyone was rushing around trying to complete their goals.  I know that the boss didn't intend for this to happen!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ron Ulrici</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:50:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>