DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! KnowHR Blog is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

  • Subscribe

  • Community

  • Top Commenters

  • Popular Threads

  • Recent Comments

    • Congrats on the site and the book. But if I am going to put out money for a book I need a copy signed by the authors.

      4 months ago by rick

      in KnowHR Redesign!

    • Oh, I'm so sad for you.. Having a vacation means finding the right place to relax and to freshen your mind by having a rest not working.. Oh, I can't enjoy my vacation in that kind of...

      4 months ago by Celebrity Sunglasses

      in What’s Your Vacation Policy?

    • Hi Jon, Thanks very much for letting us know...we changed the color in response. Thanks very much for the input...it helps. We're happy about the new design...glad you like it.

      4 months ago by Frank

      in KnowHR Redesign!

    • it seems that more and more people are aware now about this issue. when i search "Confidential do not distribute", i found only 2230 results and most of them also are blog posts on this...

      4 months ago by Cheap Textbooks

      in Confidential Do Not Distribute

    • nice one....so the moral of the story is always remember to silent your phone. By the way, i have had once a worse situation when i forgot to silent the phone during an interview and it rang in...

      4 months ago by Cheap Textbooks

      in Silence Your Cell Phones…

KnowHR Blog

Jump to original thread »
Author

KnowHR Notes: Don’t Put Confidential Information on the Internet

Started by Frank · 10 months ago

This morning on Metafilter is an article by fenniq called Security is for Suckers. The writer did something brilliantly simple and used Google to search the phrase “confidential do not distribute.” Guess what was found? 60,300 results. And the author says:
The Best Hi ... Continue reading »

2 comments

  • naarita

    2 years ago

    It's a wonder that this is the case, and it also points out how completely ineffectual these confidentiality footers are. To really protect data privacy and integrity, especially in an email, you must use encryption and anti-theft solutions, like Essential Taceo. Thus, no need for the footer or legal claimer. You're covered.
    More about Taceo: http://www.essentialsecurity.com/products.htm
    reply
  • Sarah

    2 years ago

    I repeated the search for "confidential do not distribute" on the morning of October 29, 2006 and it looks like more than 50,000 internet-users took action – at least to eliminate those words from confidential documents. I found only 9,590 results this morning. I also searched a number of variations: secret, top secret, do not distribute, for internal use only, confidential, embargoed, embargoed until, and several others. While trusty Google found many results, I did not find any documents that led to anything juicy that should remain private. It looks companies, the government, organizations and individuals all got the message that documents need to be protected through technical solutions.

    While I agree with what Naarita says above, that these footers and labels have not been effective at protecting documents on the internet, they do communicate the intent for the use of the document. With appropriate techology solutions, organizatoins can continue to make it clear to employees which documents should not be released to the public.
    reply

Add New Comment

Returning? Login