DISQUS

naarita · 3 years ago

It's a wonder that this is the case, and it also points out how completely ineffectual these confidentiality footers are. To really protect data privacy and integrity, especially in an email, you must use encryption and anti-theft solutions, like Essential Taceo. Thus, no need for the footer or legal claimer. You're covered.
More about Taceo: http://www.essentialsecurity.com/products.htm

Sarah · 3 years ago

I repeated the search for "confidential do not distribute" on the morning of October 29, 2006 and it looks like more than 50,000 internet-users took action – at least to eliminate those words from confidential documents. I found only 9,590 results this morning. I also searched a number of variations: secret, top secret, do not distribute, for internal use only, confidential, embargoed, embargoed until, and several others. While trusty Google found many results, I did not find any documents that led to anything juicy that should remain private. It looks companies, the government, organizations and individuals all got the message that documents need to be protected through technical solutions.

While I agree with what Naarita says above, that these footers and labels have not been effective at protecting documents on the internet, they do communicate the intent for the use of the document. With appropriate techology solutions, organizatoins can continue to make it clear to employees which documents should not be released to the public.