<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>KnowHR Blog - Latest Comments in How&amp;#8217;s That Job Matching Working Out?</title><link>http://knowhr.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://knowhr.disqus.com/how8217s_that_job_matching_working_out/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:21:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How&amp;#8217;s That Job Matching Working Out?</title><link>http://www.knowhr.com/blog/2008/07/17/hows-that-job-matching-working-out/#comment-1825735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ann, great point. I always get jumpy when people stand on their "standards." You're so right about performance...there are descriptors, but in application it can be something else entirely.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frank Roche</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:21:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How&amp;#8217;s That Job Matching Working Out?</title><link>http://www.knowhr.com/blog/2008/07/17/hows-that-job-matching-working-out/#comment-1825734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great quote, Frank!  It could apply to a lot of areas, including - particularly - performance standards.  Unfortunately.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ann Bares</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:15:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>